On 4/4/02 11:42 AM, "Todd Flashner" <tflash@...> wrote: >> This seems like an achievable measurement and definitely different from the >> original D1 in equation (1). I wonder what, if anything, it really tells us? > > John, > > I followed along as best I could, but I did get lost (not understanding > delta and all), but here's the deal. By the time you've measured all your > 256 density patches, what do you want to do with that data? Do you want to > compress it all into a value like 2.6, or 25db, that really tells you very > little about the characteristics of your print (short of suggesting a > density range), or would you rather plot it as a curve (which is how I've > always seen silver papers characteristics represented), to get a more > meaningful representation of the qualities of said print? I by delta (d1,d2) I just mean (d1-d2) if (d1>d2) and (d2-d1) if (d2>d1) Ie 'the positive value of the difference between' I would much rather see a plot, as you suggest, but I am trying to suggest a mathematical basis for the alternative definition of dynamic range we've seen. -- John Brownlow http://www.pinkheadedbug.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Some equations WAS Thoughts about Imaging
2002-04-04 by John Brownlow
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.