Austin, I am not sure I have much to add at this point. Still mulling things over. Charles Francis wrote me off list and brought up the term "internal contrast(s)" which I am familiar with. Sometime just thought of as "local contrast". This can be a problem in prints where the overall contrast balances out nicely in the print but there will be some area typically with fine detail of interest that covers just a tiny portion of the density range and winds up looking like mud. This seems to be a common problem with contracted developments where there has been a strong compression of tone from the scene to the negative. Is this in anyway related to what you see in the quality of the tonality of the print? Martin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 8:41 AM Subject: RE: For Roy Re: [Digital BW] Thoughts about Imaging > Hi Martin, > > > > > Ratio of minimum and maximum contrast. > > > > > > B-b-b-b-b-but Martin, isn't maximum contrast (dMax - dMin), and minimum > > > contrast the "smallest discernable [tonality]"? > > > > Austin, > > > > The problem I have is what is doing the discerning. I know that my eye > > cannot discern as small a change in tone as a densitometer for > > example. Also > > if the print changes tones in increments smaller than my eye can detect, > > then the minimum contrast would be determined by my eye and not the print. > > The idea of min/max contrast perhaps makes some sense to me but I am still > > skeptical of how it could be put to good use. I need to mull this over a > > bit. > > I understand and agree. > > <snip> > > > > > The equation is just a subtle change on > > > > the basic max > > > > to min ratio > > > > > > What's the change? The definition of "min" and "max"? > > > > No it is a clarification of what we are taking the dynamic range of. The > > dynamic range of contrast would not appear to be the same as the dynamic > > range of density. > > Hum. I had to read that a few times. In a way I agree. Density is a > static value, and really can be only a single value in and of it self > (though it's understood it is a relative value, based on a calibrated > density scale...). Contrast isn't static...it requires another thing to be > contrasted against. In that, I agree...and fits the term "dynamic" much > better. > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > Austin is > > > > not wrong in > > > > applying his contrast ratio to a photographic print but he > > has failed to > > > > demonstrate how this would be done or what value it would have when > > > > comparing two printing mediums. > > > > > > For me, that's a separate issue...I wanted to get to the point where the > > > basic concept was understood first. I take it you now understand/agree > > with > > > the statement "dynamic range of a photographic image is > > (maximum contrast > > / > > > minimum contrast)", and not the same as the density range? > > > > I better understand the relationship you are trying to define but I have > > long realized that it was something different from the density > > range. Now as > > to which is the more useful concept I am not sure. > > We are in full agreement and understanding here ;-) > > > Would it be > > inappropriate > > for a print to have more than one dynamic range? Each for different > > properties or relationships between those properties? Or perhaps the word > > dynamic range has been used in so many different ways we need some new > > terminology? > > I do believe the dynamic range of the printing system can be determined, as > well as of the paper one is printing on. Quite easily in fact. Obviously, > as has been well pointed out, the actual dynamic range of A print, in and of > it self, is a far more complex issue. I agree. I have to sit with that for > a while when I get some time. I believe I understand how it can be done, > but obviously, haven't spent the time doing it. It would be interesting (at > least to me) though. > > Regards, > > Austin > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: For Roy Re: [Digital BW] Thoughts about Imaging
2002-04-05 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.