Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Hahnemule William Turner

2002-04-11 by ljkorte

I would like to try the Wm Turner 310.

I would like to buy from Mediastreet or other supplier as they are 
far less expensive than Digital Art Supplies. (Unless it is worth 
paying the extra money for "Hahnemuhle" branded paper?)

I have looked at the excel sheet for Hahnemuhle naming 
equivalents.

There is no equivalent listed for the 310 paper (the 190 is called 
Royal Jazz, I believe).

?? What do I order from Mediastreet (or other supplier) to get the 
equivalent of the 310 William Turner??

Thanks (I know this has gone 'round and 'round)

Jeff Korte







--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., shashinka@a... wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 4/10/02 9:50:54 PM, michael.kravit@w... 
writes:
> 
> << Robert,
> 
> No, the William Turner 300 has a less gritty surface and does 
not have the
> flaking problems that the 190 had. I say "had, because 
Hahnemuhle claims
> they fixed the problem. Cone may still have an old supply, but I 
would think
> by now he would have sold it all.
> 
> I sent you the Epson Papers today, Tomorrow I will send 
William Turner 300.
> 
> Mike >>
> 
> Hi Mike:
> 
> Not to be a naysayer, but with a bit of effort, the William Turner 
butterfly 
> print from the last exchange has that somewhat fragile flaking 
issue.  It is 
> far superior to the thinner William Turner and even a bit better 
than the 
> German Etching I've used in the past.
> 
> I'm curious how you store the photographs after printing.
> 
> Do you wipe it down in any way before printing because I'd like 
to start 
> using it if I know I can minimize problems.
> 
> All the best!
> 
> -Andry Darlow
> 
> Photography, Digital Print Consulting and Custom Editions
> Andrew Darlow Images International, NYC 
www.andydarlow.com
> Author: Inkjet Tip of the Month Club (newsletter) 
> To subscribe, send e-mail to: Inkjettips-subscribe@y...

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.