I may have missed an earlier post, but: What kind of monitor do you have, and do you have any hardware/software for making profiles? I think that the best but hardest way to have a what you see is what you get workflow is to have a good monitor that allows you to control the RGB, brightness, contrast, etc. controls individually and to have a puck (e.g. something like Colorvision's Spyder) and the OptiCal/PreCal software that goes with it to be able to read the info directly from the monitor's screen. You choose a white point for the monitor and create a profile for your particular monitor that essentially corrects its way of making colors to a standard. Once that's done you can also use profiling software to make a profile for the particular printer/ink/paper combination(s) you're using, and then in theory what you see on the monitor should be what you get in a print. In all fairness, it's neither foolproof nor 100% reliable, since there are so many gremlins out there. And a print, created with dyes or pigments, and which we see with light reflected off the surface will never look just like a monitor image. But it can get you very close and it can save you the time and hassle of making print after print and making change after change to a file to get something to look good. Stephen Petegorsky petegorsky@... www.spphoto.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] monitor calibration
2002-04-23 by Stephen Petegorsky
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.