Jerry Olson wrote:
> Thanks for the info Keith,
>
> In your review, please tell us how the new canon differs from the
> epson 1280, and if it has any serious drawbacks.
Funny you should ask.. The 1280 is the focus of a separate review by me
that will run first...
Will give you the links to each piece as soon as they are pout up by
the pubs...
>
[Keith]
****************************************************************
CONFIDENTIALITY & COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
This e-mail message, including attachments and contents, is © Copyright,
Keith Krebs, 2001-2002, All Rights Reserved. It is expressly for the
sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Absent the express written authorization of the
author, any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, transfer, or
distribution is explicitly prohibited and taken at your own risk. If you
are not, or are unsure whether you are, the intended recipient, please
contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the original
message. Violations will be prosecuted to the FULL extent allowed under
applicable civil and criminal law. Imagery published or distributed in
violation of these conditions shall be subject to a $1500/image
liquidated damages charge, in addition to any applicable Copyright
violation penalties.
[POV IMage Service Banner]
****************************************************************
{ The P.O.V. Image Service Website is still at http://www.p-o-v-image.com/ }
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] Canon printers
2002-04-21 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.