Barry, If dmax is 1.8 and dmin is 0.05 then the Density Range is 1.75. To find what percentage of the Density Range .6 is divide .6/1.75=0.34 or 34% Mike On Tuesday, April 23, 2002, at 08:31 PM, flyfishingusa2002 wrote: > Jeff, > Thanks for the math! Now here's the question, If Dmax = 1.8 and Dmin > = 0.05 What percentage of the dynamic range is, say, .6? Can you > show us how to do it? > > Barry > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "iwasnvrhere" > <iwasnvrhere@y...> wrote: >> This might help. >> optical density (OD): For a given wavelength, an expression of > the >> transmittance of an optical element. Note 1: Optical density is >> expressed by log10(1/T ) where T is transmittance. (188) Note 2: > The >> higher the optical density, the lower the transmittance. Note 3: >> Optical density times 10 is equal to transmission loss expressed > in >> decibels, e.g. , an optical density of 0.3 corresponds to a >> transmission loss of 3 dB. Def of optical density. >> >> Jeff >> >> >> >> >>> John, >>> You are at the same point as I am. Well, actually I'm a little >>> ahead. The density readings are log to the base 10 so dividing > the >>> Dmax by 2 will not give you the expected 50% reading. I am >> currently >>> trying to figure out the math. >>> I will let you know when I get there, >>> >>> Barry >>> >>> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., John Chervinsky >>> <chervinsky@d...> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am attempting to calibrate my printer output using a > calibrated >>> X-Rite 810 densitometer. I am using MIS FS inks through an > Epson >>> 1160 onto PhotoRag 308 paper; I am on a Mac computer. I realize >>> that this question has come up in the past, but practical > elements >>> of technique were omitted. Below you will find the reflective >>> densitometer (visual) output vs a 21 step stepwedge. I did >>> measurements using both the Randall and Piezography workflows. > If >>> you look at the numbers carefully, you will conclude as to how >>> shockingly non-linear they are. I would have expected, for > example >>> that the 50 % reading would have been close to 1.7/2 = .85. The >>> Measured value of around 0.6 is WAY off! >>>> >>>> Has anyone else had this experience? I would not think that my >>> paper choice would have that much effect. Are there subtle >>> differences in using a reflective densitometer as opposed to a >>> spectrophotometer to do the measurements? It would seem that for >>> grayscale work that a densitometer should be fine. Please > advise. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> -John Chervinsky >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> STEPWEDGE CONE RANDALL >>>> 100.0 1.71 1.77 >>>> 95.00 1.54 1.66 >>>> 90.00 1.40 1.57 >>>> 85.00 1.26 1.45 >>>> 80.00 1.15 1.33 >>>> 75.00 1.05 1.20 >>>> 70.00 0.96 1.07 >>>> 65.00 0.86 0.95 >>>> 60.00 0.78 0.83 >>>> 55.00 0.69 0.76 >>>> 50.00 0.61 0.66 >>>> 45.00 0.54 0.58 >>>> 40.00 0.48 0.48 >>>> 35.00 0.42 0.39 >>>> 30.00 0.36 0.32 >>>> 25.00 0.29 0.27 >>>> 20.00 0.24 0.21 >>>> 15.00 0.19 0.17 >>>> 10.00 0.14 0.13 >>>> 5.00 0.09 0.09 >>>> 0.00 0.05 0.05 > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls > and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to > keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject > header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the > various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Densitometry Help
2002-04-24 by Michael J. Kravit
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.