Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: MIS Gloss Coat

2002-04-24 by iwasnvrhere

Why doesn't anyone laminate their prints? I've asked about it 
before and got no reply. Do you have an opinion on it? Has anyone 
tried it? It's done a lot with outdoor color inkjet-wide format and 
such but I see nothing about it here. Can anyone tell me why? Does it 
suck, not work, look lame, cheap? Anyone? Anyone?


Thanks, I feel so much better after a good rant.
Jeff 

> Todd,
> I inquired about this product about a month ago.  They are having 
> problems with it (exactly what I don't know), but for now, from 
what 
> I understand they are no longer selling it... it does sound like a 
> terrific idea though... When I have the time and resources, I would 
> like to follow up on it, perhaps picking the brains of MIS.  It 
does 
> sound to me potentially the best way of consistently applying a top 
> coat to a print....
> 
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Todd Flashner 
<tflash@e...> 
> wrote:
> > Has anyone tried the MIS Gloss Coat?
> > 
> > From their website:
> > 
> > "MIS Gloss Coat Sample - Gloss Coat is a clear odorless coating 
> which can be
> > applied to a glossy archival pigmented print to eliminate dull 
> spots and to
> > seal the surface to make the print more durable. Requires a 
second 
> printer
> > to apply. Comes in a 2 oz sample bottle, virgin empty cartridge 
not
> > included. 
> > 
> > $5.00"
> > 
> > Sounds like a good idea but I wonder about clogs, and for that 
> matter how
> > does one do a nozzle check???
> > 
> > Todd
> >

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.