Julian wrote on 24 April >I'm trying to find ways to produce a high > quality dig neg, and I've not found one sharpenough yet. So, I'm silver > printing those neghs that need it and dig printing those that look better on > inkjet. And I thought it was just me not getting really sharp digital prints! I fear my circa GBP10,000 investment in digital has been a waste, what with microbanding (about 8 bands per mm on the 1160s) that won't go away. Surely not everyone out there takes pictures of blurred flowing water! Colin --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Julian Thomas" <julianthomas@t...> wrote: > > > But what I miss is the depht and contrast that the Lyson prints > > has. - A glossy paper with some inks that shows deep blacks > > and prints well at both glossy and matte papers and shows no > > metamerisms.. > > > > Is it possible at all to produce a digital print that beats the > > traditional silverbased print in every way? > > > > Anyone who has some experiences? > Bjorn, you are using a totally different system that is more akin to > platinum than to silver prints. I'm trying to find ways to produce a high > quality dig neg, and I've not found one sharpenough yet. So, I'm silver > printing those neghs that need it and dig printing those that look better on > inkjet. > > Julian
Message
Re: And I thought it was me - was [Digital BW] Lyson Quad Metamerim problems
2002-04-25 by colingruk
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.