>, and am desperately trying to find a 5x7 >scanner that >doesn't break the bank. Any suggestions? >Thanks! >Herb > I would recommend 5x7 at this >point as it will give you an advantage over 4x5 at the scanning >stage. > Maybe a 6x4.5 for the portrait work and a 5x7 for the >landscapes? >Something to thing about. > Martin Wesley It's nice to know I'm not the only one around here using a 5x7, the neglected step-child of large format. Herb, if you're looking for a scanner for 5x7 and have an extra $18,000 between the cushions of your couch, an Imacon should work just fine. But if you're like me and refuse to spend that much on a car(the Imacon doesn't get very good mileage, I'm told), and have more time than money, here's my $400 workaround. I recently got an Epson 2450 which will scan 4x5. The light source is actually 4x9. I made a 5x7 neg carrier using the 4x5 as a template. I then scan my 5x7s in two pieces and stitch them together in Photoshop. It takes a few minutes longer but I'm making beautiful prints and still have money left for film. -Alan __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com
Message
Re:My wife does not understand me
2002-04-27 by Sanders-Herring
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.