At 3:30 PM +0000 4/28/02, garrysarre wrote: >[snip] Channel mixer is also useless to me as I start with a B&W >neg. What else is there? I seem to have no response when I put up a >post. [snip] If I didn't respond to Garry's previous post(s), I think he must not be using the only sepia solution I know anything about, MIS's new VM Sepia-Neutral inkset to Paul Roark's specs. In any case, Sepia-Neutral seems to me to work very well in an 1160 starting with either B & W or RGB. I would not, however, say that the prints are a "rich golden sepia" with any one of the four curves you can download on InkSupply.com. But they might be if the curves are adjusted or the yellow slider, which I also haven't tried, is used. Sam >Sepia bloody sepia > >Someone tell me if they have a better idea and what the hell I am >doing. > >I've been fiddle farting around with this sepia thing for months. My >heart yearns for the tuth. My intention has been to try a get it >close on a desktop before purchasing larger. I am thoroughly spoilt >as I print B&W Neg onto colour RC Paper and filtrate to get a rich >goldern sepia and it gives me the total poops trying to get close to >that with inkjet. > >I start with a black & white neg scan. > >A "not bad" method I have tried is to start with a desaturated RGB >image off the B&W neg and adjust colour - shadows, midtones & >highlights equally. I will get horrible crossover before I even >start if you just try mids. > >My sepi is very rich, so my settings were 20y 15r each. Try >proportionally less if you want weaker. This leads to another >problem. If I have the "Preserve Luminosity" checked, the levels >change quite drastically, sometimes actually chopping off the shadow >end of the histogram, if I leave it unchecked it just does weird >things. In any case, I figured that I must adjust the histogram at >the very end of the process and make sure it is intact. If it isn't >then I try this - > >I found that if I converted to CMYK and then did the same colour >adjustment, my histogram was left fairly intact and then just >switched back down to RGB again for final output. My next step is >the MIS sepia neautal inks with a guess at which curves to use. Paul >suggests 1280 for my 890 but they're not fully refined as yet. > >I may be doing this all wrong but when I have tried duotones, the >histogram is devistated. Channel mixer is also useless to me as I >start with a B&W neg. What else is there? I seem to have no response >when I put up a post. > >This sepia bizzo seems to be the hardest thing to get to grips with. > > >Garry Sarre > >www.sarre.com.au
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Sepia - Bloody Sepia!
2002-04-28 by Sam A. McCandless
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.