I never used Cone inks, and carefully filled 9000 carts in my 7000. Before the MIS-FS inks, I had MIS-VM inks installed. However, I experienced a lot of posterizing and roughness with VM inks and Epson driver. I don't see that with the ImagePrint software and FS inks. In fact the prints look great except for the olive cast. And yes they do look more neutral under daylight lighting conditions. The greenies are most evident in the mid tones. If they warmed up a bit,that would be great. How long does it normally take for them to warm noticeably? Bruce McElhaney McElhaney Portait Studio Livonia, MI --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Thom McGraw <thom@t...> wrote: > I use the FS inks in an 1160 and notice a bit of olive > green on my prints; however, this is only evident > under tungsten lighting. And, if I leave them exposed > unprotected (no glass) for a while - depending on the > paper - they turn a lovely shade of brown. Museo > seems to be the worst offender for - what I term it - > the tungsten greenies. I recently printed a duplicate > of a print that had been displayed for a few months > (both on museo) and noticed quite a difference. > Again, this is viewed under tungsten: New print > green, old print brownish. To my eye, the nearest I > can get to a neutral print is to use Eclipse Satine. > > So, out of curiosity, do you see the greenies in all > lighting situations, or just tungsten? Of course, and > I don't mean to continually beat a dead horse, after > viewing the purple haze of Lysonic inks, probably > everything will look green to me. > > Thom > > --- photo734 <photo734@e...> wrote: > > I just recently installed MIS-FS inks in my 7000. > > Have been using > > them with a demo copy of ImagePrint 4, but can't > > seem to get rid of > > the slight green cast in all two dozen large prints > > so far. The > > greenies appear accross the grayscale but are more > > evident in the mid > > tones. It is visible with both Crane Mueso and > > Somerset PE papers.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Greenies with MIS-FS?
2002-05-02 by btmcelhaney
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.