I haven't used Goshawk, but on another list Hawk Mountain reps were saying that Goshawk is really only good for printing bright colors, and that for BW or subtle color work it isn't a good choice. I don't really understand why this would be, but I figure they probably wouldn't pass up a chance to sell us paper so there's probably some truth to it. Might be worth giving them a call and asking about it. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Thom McGraw <thom@t...> wrote: > Like most people, I'm searching. I'm searching for > that thicker version of EAM (and no watermarks, of > course)...a paper not as flimsy and cold as Legion > Photo Matte...a paper that doesn't cost more than a > buck a sheet (letter size)...a paper where the blacks > don't scuff so easily...a paper somewhat like Eclipse > Soft White, but the weight somewhere between 190 and > 300 ( I have to raise my print head to the plus > position to print with Eclipse 300, and, even after > aligning the heads, my usual micro banding turns into > macro banding)...I haven't found that paper, yet. > > Having been on the Hawk Mountain site yesterday, > browsing through their alternatives, I came across > Goshawk - nice price, nice weight - does anybody have > any experience with this paper? I have a few sheets > of their Peregrine which printed well with Lyson > quads, but not so well with MIS FS (bad blacks). > Anyway, I'll see if I can order some samples on Monday > and eventually report back my findings. > > Thom
Message
Re: Alternatives to EAM?
2002-05-05 by charles_bandes
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.