A great print (silver/inkjet or whatever)
- depends on the capabiliy to produce a great negative (file)
- depends on the capabilty to pre-visualize a great picture
- depends on the capability to discover great images in one“s
soul
- depends on the sensitivity of the artist
And other sensitive human beings will be able to recognize a
great print, whatever gallerists are thinking, saying or dealing
with.
At least I hope so.
Bernd
-- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Robert Morrison
<rmorrison@p...> wrote:
> On 5/6/02 7:24 AM, "toomagenta@a..." <toomagenta@a...>
wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 5/6/2002 2:38:58 AM Eastern Daylight
Time,
> > billagee@r... writes:
> >
> >
> >> believe me, your brother in law ( I assume you used him as
an
> >> example because he is not a photographer) cannot
produce these prints
> >> on his 1280. It takes a lot more skill than just hitting the print
> >> button...you are forgetting the Photoshop steps as well as
the skill
> >> the photographer has in making the original image..
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Bill,
> > I believe the general public does not have the above quoted
perception of
> > digital photography.
> > And if you look at all the ads by Epson, Canon etc. you can
understand why.
> > "Buy this printer and you too can do this in your living room
folks!"
> > But its the same with general photography. Anybody
remember that Canon
> > commercial where there were two photographers at a sports
event, and you had
> > to guess which one was the professional? Of course the
good looking guy with
> > the beautiful images taken by his Rebel was the amateur.
The stumbling dork
> > with the twenty two photo devices all around him whose
pictures were no
> > better than the other guy's was the pro!
> > These companies sell equipment to the public by showing
what they can do with
> > the equipment. Of course the learning curve is too steep, and
that's why
> > professionals still exist.
> > But that doesn't mean the public will stop buying the
equipment and expecting
> > to do as well as an artist or professional.
> > That Canon ad didn't run too long. I would like to think that's
because Canon
> > realised the disrespect they showed towards their
professional clientele.
> > George J Kunze
> >
>
> Response mainly to Gregory,
>
> This is yet another example of the person who walks into an art
gallery and
> says that my 3 year old could have done that. Don't worry, real
gallery
> owners know their 3 year old can't do that...so do the people
that buy the
> work. They realize that art is vision, idea and technique. If you
are
> having trouble getting your inkjet prints into photodealers...then
I suggest
> you start looking to art galleries...they are typically much less
> conservative when it comes to new materials. I've seen
several piezo shows
> by people on this and other lists at very high end art galleries.
The work
> was well received and sold well. If the art gallery doesn't like
your
> inkjet prints either...then most likely you need to reconsider
your vision
> and idea.
>
> RobertMessage
Re: Inkjet prints and galleries
2002-05-06 by ruhrfoto
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.