In a message dated 5/6/02 12:06:48 PM, rmorrison@... writes: > I >was just speaking with someone this weekend that has been using the new >printers for a month. He also uses quad ink sets on similar class >(7000/9000) machines. He suggested that the new epson printers do a better >job than the old ones making BW images with color inks...but that the quad >prints were still far superior for critical BW work. Yes, given craftsmanship, knowledge, and a certain amount of messing about, it is possible to beat the results of the new machines in some areas. My point was that the B&W market was small to begin with, and offered minimal profit incentive for development. Now there will be an even smaller market and less likelihood of third party development because "anybody" can print pretty good black and white straight from the box. Thats a good thing, in terms of empowering the end user and lowering the bar, but a bad thing in terms of nurturing a B &W art market, and holding the quality standard. Its also how progress typically works, and theres not much anyone can do about it. If it proves an area of value, the next generation of Epsons may improve further still, and continue edging in on the custom B&W print market. What I haven't quite doped out yet is the relationship between gray balancing and custom ICC profiles with the new machines. With the total Under Color Removal, for truely neutral images the profile should not any effect, other than controlling the gray ramp... though it would still be great for color controlling tints. C. David Tobie Design Cooperative CDTobie@...
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Piezo v. Epson resolution -- was (unknown)
2002-05-07 by CDTobie@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.