Digital BW, The Print

Brian,

I read Mike's post, and I think what he said is just another way of 
saying "not entirely accurate", or "I don't think that's right".  
It's a linguistic thing, not, as I read it, a personal attack on you 
at all.

That's the problem with all lists.  If you and Mike were standing in 
front of each other, these misunderstandings would be dealt with 
immediately.  

Mike is a decent fellow who I have cause to thank personally for his 
help, as so many others here do also.  I have no doubt you are also a 
decent guy :-)

--
Quentin  



-- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., MagerabamB@n... wrote:
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "antonisphoto" 
<antonisphoto@y...> wrote:
> 
> >(that my) attack of Mike Kravit on message 14273 is, however, 
> >unacceptable, and similar language in the future will be 
considered 
> >grounds for removal from the list. We have to draw the line 
somewhere, 
> >for the benefit of everyone, and this is where it's drawn.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Antonis,
> 
> I did not attack Mike Kravitt. Mike wrote that what I said was 
untrue when it was actually true. I wrote that what Mike said was a 
lie when it was in fact not the truth. I asked him for an apology for 
his attack on me. I apologized to the group for reacting, not 
attacking.
> 
> Mike has to accept his own responsibility. And I for one do not 
want to go down on this list as an attacker.
> 
> No one should be above reproach, don't you agree? Shouldn't 
everyone be treated equally?
> 
> respect,
> 
> Brian
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________
> Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. 
Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! 
http://shopnow.netscape.com/
> 
> Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com/