Whoever perpetrated this behind-the-back move is, in my book, a crass craven coward.. I spent years working in politics and this is a move beneath all but the slimiest people I encountered in that field. This list and other lists are meant to be places where opinions axiomatically differ and ideas are exchanged. The more opinions that are silenced the less information we all have as group members. It is through that VERY open exchange of information that we all advance the art. To take disputes offlist is bad enough, but to actually make up commentary to undercut someone on this list is utterly reprehensible and almost beyond comment.. Whoever this person was... I don't know whom you thought was benefiting in your little ego-play (except your own feelings of grandiosity), but by silencing a consistent contributor to this list, you have harmed every member of it. Mike, as an aside.. If this harms your business in ANY way, I would say you have a VERY strong case for a libel/slander action against whomever this loser is. You could actually file against "John Doe" and force those who were contacted to name the individual once the suit is filed. In my opinion, this was done with malice and could easily be shown to be malicious. Whoever you are, you crossed a clear ethical line here. This is the kind of crap we all see from 10 year olds, not adults. I may not agree with every one of Mike's or anyone's posts, but to concoct a hoax to undercut someone... all I can say is the perpetrator must feel mighty psychologically inadequate if they need to resort to such means instead of confronting disagreements, etc., personally and openly. I hope others will join me in apologizing to Mike for the actions of another group member and ask him to consider remaining an active participant. Keith
Message
Re: [Digital BW] A strike below the belt.
2002-05-09 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.