--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Editor P.O.V. Image Service" <editor@p...> wrote: > Everyone needs to get a grip... These are just TOOLS.. > > There is no such thing as a perfect, one-size fits all, does everything TOOL... Hey Keith this was an awesome post. It hit home a couple of important issues. But Kieeeeeeeeeeeeeeth the squeeky wheel gets oiled. If people don't bring it up and question, complain, etc. those providing the products will assume everything is good and that there's no need for improvement. Besides if feels so good to rant sometimes ;) On the subject of dye vs. pigment I would beg this question of any and everyone using digital B&W. WHAT DO YOU WANT? If providers knew, really knew, what everyone wanted/needed there probably wouldn't be this dye/pigment divergence. Your tool analogy was perfect, the one size fits all campaign isn't working and I believe a detriment to advancing the technology this art. The technology needs be mute and in the background allowing artists to create, not struggle with a lot the issues that we see coming up here for instance. It's turning artists into technicians and I (call me naive) imagine it's taking away a lot of the enjoyment. So I would ask the question WHAT DO YOU WANT in your inksets, software, printer platforms. I think a critical mistake was made at the beginning with the jump into carbon pigment inks, now before I'm tarred, feathered and set aflame let my qualify that. I think a better route to take would have been to match the characteristics of the best traditional photographic techniques currently available and slowly evolve the chemistry and technology to eliminate the bad points and perfect the good. What happens to a silver, selium, sepia, or palladium/platnum traditional print when it's exposed to light, ozone, etc? OK sorry for the long post anyone who actually read this. Please fill me in as I have been in this group since April and still haven't gotten a good idea of what's relly needed. Thank very much in advance to anyone who responds. Jeff
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Lyson SG and 1160
2002-05-14 by iwasnvrhere
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.