Nij, I see You sell one of this systems. I didn't know - how did you dare to tell what tubes that was used on "your" selling system - I'm glad you did but also astonished.... However you gave me the track and helped me. Let solve the problem. There is no problems for You as I can see - It's my fault in a way - right - being a baby using my three 1290's. What did I do wrong - I as an engineer built them - and found it a very simple no nonce construction - it's the idea that is brilliant. It is some bottles, some tubes and a connection to the carts. Somthing to hold it toghther - there is no sort of religion in that. By plugging the carts you get a slight underpressure in the carts that soakes the "ink" into the carts - that's it , a splended idea - with a very simple solution. What can go wrong if everything works "mechanicly" - just one thing - the choice of material for that construction - nothing else. The other things that can go wrong - I know them all - I did some of them to test - and not to test - Never touch a cartrige when placed in the printer - those cheap carts without popetvalves naturaly soaks air if lifted as there is an underpressure in them. Those carts are bad - compared to Epsons original with popetvalves as well with a screenfilter. By the way MIS has a screenfilter in it's carts - that's OK - but still not as good as epsons Original cartriges. I take it for granted that NIJ's carts has that screenfilter as well - I don't no or care! Mine has it anyway! I think this screenfilters are important as if we got "grease" into the cartrige as well - that must be a must! So in the end about the systems - they are like twins but have as twins slightly different approach - almost not to se looking at it technicaly! Then - we are here again - what's left - yes the choice of material for the parts. As allready stated I have been in contact with Saint-Gobain - and their engineers - and we talk the same languge since I'm an Civilengineer myself among other things. We are now testing other tubes - the delivered tube are not suited as a good choice! That's it. We are also talking prices - and I might help those that belive in my investigation - and my experinces on my one of my systems. Remember that this CAN happen even to a dye printer - as when glycerol is emtyied from whater it's like grease - this is the case if you seldom use the printer - and the tubes are exposed with the same ink to air then you use it again - but the "glycerolgrease" is still there and if you wait some time untiln you use the printer again - the glyserol will buikd up further. With dispersionink (qaud, or pigment it's worse - her also the pigment settles) This grease is then exposed to air by absorbtion - because of the bad tubes - and make it further worse - and might als affect the density of inks - it's characteristic by oxidating etc etc) The tubes I'm getting has either a Fluorethylene coating in it or is made of tetrafluoroethylene-polymere. Ther will certainly be many tryings before we get one with the right Shore hardnes and the right flexabilitu to run smouth! If not this company can do it there are others to grab - there are plenty of factories and companies doing this tubes for industry and hospitaluse. We will find a "RR" I think! My advice - go on buying - change the tubes when they are found! MIS or NIJ's - for me that's twins they are just lookalikes. Ihad bought the chepest - that also can deliver lots of inks and solutions. It's up to You though! So let's come to the conclusion OK: Belive Nij - there is No problems - buy his system it's exellent , marvoulus - splended. Or buy any system and change tubes when on market or recomended! I have used the whole day speaking and asking, learning about the tubes they offer - the tubes Nij gave me is for the purpose "sh..t". They agree It has both absorbtion of air (inwards) and permation (outwords) - the permation make the fluid evaporate when it hits the surface of the tube, the absorbtion is oxidating (or can oxidate) things inside the tube. That's facts - call TYGON (That is Saint- Gobain a major company in this business) After several talks and E-mails it clear for me - that they as well as for me that tubes are not "really" proper for it purpose "regarding the time of use and the low flow of fluids in it - add to that - they question the fluids chemical mixture - "And We would never sugest that tube for that purpose" end qoute) Now I'm getting some samples from them that has all the suggested and intellectually "right" ones to test. They don't absorb air and they don't permatate. It's so simple when you study it Nij. The tubes will cost some dollars more of cause - but I had been glad to pay those dollars from the beginning - it's not much - for them this tubes are small and the dollars we talk about is unsignificant regarding the total sum for such a system. The one chosed on your system is one of the cheapest. I suppose that's the same with MIS - but I can not talk for them - I have still not got their information. And sending mail to them is a lottery! You must call them - for sure they answer! That's good! Do you really think I do this for scaring people! Not at all! Its an alert for two things: 1/The tubes are not suited for the application. 2/It might explane some odd things that has happened - and there was no answers for many of them - perhaps here are a lot of answers. That's it Nij and I'm sorry that this was so long! I'm so tired now that I don't even will correct my errors here. Please remember I'm not a english/US man I'm made in Sweden By the way - buy Nij's system - I have seen that he tells it's superior to anything reading all inlays from You Nij. /smile/ None of them are best - all the systems suffer from bad quality tubing! And I'm sorry if Nij is right - If I scared you all - that's not good for business/smile/! Best Regards Bo Wrangborg --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Nij" <nigel@m...> wrote: > Hi Bo, > > I just told you what is on the system I use and sell. However, it is for MIS > to answer if that is the tubing they use (i.e. that you have on your > system). > > However, I would dispute with you that it (the tygon tubing) is 'sh..t'! I > follow your logic on the possible loss of liquid from the ink- lines, but I > disagree... and whether or not you have that actual make/model of tubing is > not necessarily true by default... indeed, if it is not written on the > tubes... it possibly is not. > > I understand that you probably have to change the tubes yourself anyway, > given that yours are greased up, but I would disagree that the size of the > tube is not important. This is my gut feeling, I do not have scientific > knowledge. But, too thin, and I think you will have problems due to > resistance and limited ink flow. Too thick, and possible problems due to > loss of any kind of capillary action and too much weight of ink for the > print head to pull ink (or the support bar to hold, or the print head to > shift back and forth, who knows?). > > It is not helpful to scare people when the absolute majority of users are > working fine with their CIS / CFS / whatever with what they have... and have > in many cases been running for a long time. > > Should your post and your knowledge be ignored? No. But to vent your anger > at one product part because you have had a problem _in_ it is not > necessarily correct. Even though you have some apparently scientific > evidence as to why it might be a problem, it does not make it _the_ > problem... just 'maybe'... or perhaps a number of problems came together to > cause your problem! > > What are MIS doing to help you? > > I wish you well in resolving your problems! > > best regards, > nij > > Nigel Rheam > MWORDS Limited www.mwords.co.uk Digital Fine Art > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sm7bxd [mailto:sm7bxd@y...] > > Sent: 15 May 2002 05:31 > > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y... > > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: RED ALERT - Attension - MIS Black! > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Hi - I have been investigating all night - > > > > look at this "Chemfluor® FEP Tubing" it's 55 Shore soft I was > > thinking of that when doing this "job" - the same as the "old bad > > ones"! The same Shore softness as the ones we have - Nij said it was > > "Tygon® Vacuum Tubing Formulation R-3603" and it has also 55 Shore. > > > > Bingo! > > > > Have the look here: > > > > http://www.tygon.com/new/europe/english/en_europe_index.html > > > > Scroll this side until you find it! It has as I see it everything > > I'm looking for - perhaps I'll call England or France tomorrow (hmmm. > > today...that is) > > > > I want this solved - give a damn what it costs - it is just some > > tubes of quality I want! That can't be a fortune! > > Maybee the fright is higher...not unusal bying smal no nonce things! > > > > > > For now I think it is what I'm looking for - shall also talk to my > > friens "hospitalengineer/designer" about it - It's exacly how he > > described what to look for. And it has the same "softness" as the > > ones that we use now! But that's not all - perhaps som inovation is > > to be done - they don't give the diameters on the web - however - > > with some fittings that shall be of no problems. > > > > I was thinking of some selfclosing connections I found anyway - to > > ease maintenance and cleaning! They are made in a way that most small > > tubes fit and also if not the exact dimension is found (it's > > european) and are certainly made in the metric system) they may also > > help to connect to the cartriges - using the "old bad" tube to > > connect to the new "real ones". The selfclosing connection is conic > > in bothe directions and you just cut a bit of the cone to meke them > > perfect! > > > > That's it! > > > > Two -three hours sleep now - and then on it again calling England or > > France and have a talk! > > > > They must have resellers in Scandinavia as well! > > > > Problems - hard (somtimes amusing) work - sulution! > > Most of anything is out there - the industri must run - we benefit > > that! > > > > Throw out old bad cheap things that don't cost to begin with! > > > > Still I'm a bit upset - seeing what you can get - but an eloge to Nij, > > if he hadn't told me what "sh..t" that we used - I would have to do > > one more day of work to find out! > > Thanks again NIJ! > > Thanks again Jeff! > > > > This is how discussiongroups schould work! > > > > > > Non plus Ultra! > > > > Here You fellows soon! > > > > Regards > > > > Bo Wrangborg > > Made in Sweden
Message
[Digital BW] Re: RED ALERT - Attension - MIS Black!
2002-05-15 by sm7bxd
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.