Hi Todd, > You keep saying how easily your images can posterize and if Dan want's to > see it, or for lunch at Le Cirque, no problemo, you have images ready to > show. However, whenever I ask to see them you waffle. Not waffling at all! Why should I spend my time proving something to someone who can easily, with a little work on their own, do the experiment for them selves? > You also keep talking to me like I don't understand the topic, or know how > to avoid posterization in my own images; as if I'm having a problem I'm > asking you to solve. No, not at all. I know you understand this, and as far as I know, you don't have any problems with posterization. Others read this discussion, and they may not fully understand what you understand. > I think you know I scan and manipulate in 16-bit > routinely and have a decent knowledge of the subject and how to utilize my > scanner, Photoshop, and my printer. I hope that doesn't sound > arrogant, I'm > not saying I'm good, I have seen your prints, and I would say you are good, in fact, quite good. > All I was asking you to do was to demonstrate your results - the same > results you say you can obtain and recognize in a heartbeat. But isn't it better for you (or others) to do it on your own, and see for your self? You can lead a horse to water... ;-) Regards, Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] 8x16 bits and BW
2002-05-23 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.