Jim, >--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Paul Roark" ><paul.roark@v...> wrote: >> Today I've been using the PS 6 Preview/View, Proof Setup, Custom >> Profile/Tyler post method (all in a single function keystroke PS "Action" >> now). So far it's working very well and very easily. > >Yes, I tried it last night and it works well. Also, I'm relieved to >know that my method doesn't mess things up. ... >1) When I open a new image, I have to go through the softproof setup >anew. This can be put in an action of course and made simple. But it >seems that there must be some way to get Photoshop to always remember >the softproof setup, so that all one has to do is toggle it on or off >for any newly opened image. You should not have to re-do the custom dot gain curve. That should have been saved in a place where the preview looks. You do have to go to View, Proof Setup, Custom, ... . It is these keystrokes that can be easily put into an Action, so that a single function key (in Windows) does the entire procedure immediately. I don't know if there is a way that PS would initiate the Action upon each opening. I'm not sure that I'd want that anyway, since not all the images I open are going to be printed through the workflow to which the custom dot gain curve matched. >2) How about reverse-softproofing? That is, set the color settings to >the custom dotgain, and the softproofing setup to gamma 2.2....the >real question here is can one toggle on softproofing when wanting to >print only, and will it convert from that "soft" space to sRGB >accurately so that your curves could be applied and then print output >obtained? I don't know. It's getting too complex for me to deal with this morning. You might try the various approached with the 21-step test file, and just measure the values of the 95% after the RGB conversion, but before a tone curve is applied. That is where the mis-mapping of the first procedure I tries became apparent (as well as in the prints). So, just know where the 95% is supposed to end up in RGB and see where it ends up with the procedure you're thinking about. Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Matching the Monitor to the Print
2002-05-26 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.