How long ago did you get your demo? Was it for mac or pc? Just curious. What printer were you using? My best results by far are on the 7000. Desktop support is brand new (at least for the mac)...I think I got the very first copy. So far I'd say that I favor Piezo for desktop...but the ability to get profiles made is really attractive. Imageprint has the definite advantage of not being a plugin...and allows you to run multiple jobs simultaneously...I've had three printers going with no significant performance hit. Both products have their usefulness...I'm certainly not planning to sell my piezo license. I think that the piezo plugin is unbeatable as a way to get started in quad printing...but for power users I think imageprint is worth a look. Robert On 6/4/02 5:39 PM, "Nij" <nigel@...> wrote: > hi Robert, > > your experience thus far does not match mine. A Demo of ImagePrint showed a > definite grain structure (based on a square pattern it seemed to me) where a > Piezo print of the same image, same paper, same alignment, was smooth and > 'structureless' under magnification. It seemed to me that the Piezo profiles > were slightly smoother (there was some 'blotchiness' to the image from > ImagePrint as the tone moved towards Black. > > Having said all that, I did not make any major effort to realign the printer > to see if I could get the IP software to be dotless. Just my brief > experience thus far. > > Best regards, > Nij > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Robert Morrison [mailto:rmorrison@...] >> Sent: 04 June 2002 18:45 >> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Imageprint 4 question >> >> >> On 6/4/02 5:37 AM, "toomagenta@..." <toomagenta@...> wrote: >> >>> In a message dated 6/3/2002 9:42:54 PM Eastern Daylight Time, >>> rmorrison@... writes: >>> >>> >>>> I'm looking at Imageprint output on EAM printed from my 7000 with an 8x >>>> loupe...solid grey patches and I see no pattern whatsoever. >>>> >>>> Robert >>>> >>> >>> Robert, >>> Is it possible I saw a defective print? I based my decision on >> which system >>> to go with on the strength (or weakness) of that print. >>> George Z Kunze >>> >>> >> You might have seen a print from a desktop printer...I can see >> some pattern >> at 8x with imageprint on my 1280 whereas piezo doesn't show >> anything...from >> the 7000, however, I can't see any pattern in the 7000 Imageprint output. >> Using a print as a determination IMO is really dicey...I like to use step >> wedges...that way you know you have a flat area to judge...don't >> imagine it >> was the same print between the two systems? >> >> Robert >> > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other > resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various > resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Imageprint 4 question
2002-06-05 by Robert Morrison
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.