For those that didn't see this on the piezo list, below is a post from Jon Cone with a URL to get to a scan of a 100 hour Xenon fade of the Piezotones vs. the MIS FS inks. You may need to be a member of the piezo3000 list to be able to access the URL...I'm not sure. It shows that the Piezotones warm much less than the MIS FS set. It is very difficult to judge from this image whether there are any density differences at this point. Robert ------ Forwarded Message From: Jon Cone <piezobw@...> Reply-To: piezography3000@yahoogroups.com Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 19:50:06 -0500 To: piezography3000@yahoogroups.com Subject: [piezoBW] PiezoTone inks and MIS-FS inks in 100 hour Xenon fade test http://groups.yahoo.com/group/piezography3000/files/100hr-Xenon-Tests/ In the folder above are images of the results of 100 hours of Xenon Arc testing on both the new PiezoTone WN inks and the MIS-FS inks on Hahnemuhle photo rag. The rapid warm fade of the MIS-FS inks is very obvious by comparison. While I am not trying to stir up any MIS vs Piezography debates, I did want to demonstrate what we believe is a vast improvement to inks which Piezography users have the choice of using.
Message
PiezoTone vs. MIS FS warming
2002-06-13 by Robert Morrison
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.