All, Frankly, it is nice when we get information on this list from folks with no axe to grind, as some posts seem to indicate. Others... I'm not so sure. For myself, I have run the Cone original inks, which warmshift to a degree I find troubling. I have also run MIS-FS's, which also warmshift, although somewhat less than the Cone originals. I find their blacks lacking. Both inksets fade, in my experience, as demonstrated by window tests. I do wonder, if the FS's are so pure, why do they shift at all? What's going on there? Now I've got PiezoTone in the 7000, and they are definitely producing the best images I've ever seen. I use the Pro24 RIP, and the profiles actually seem to work better than with either of the previous inksets, and that makes me very happy. This comparison is done printing the exact same image file on the same paper/software/printer. The PiezoTones produce better shadow detail rendering. It's too early to tell on how they fare as far as fading is concerned, but none have warmshifted in about a month's worth of printing. I have not mounted window tests as of yet, but intend to. I do love the color, as it is closest to my darkroom stuff, and they do seem to emanate a certain depth, no doubt due to the superb blacks. I'm not going to defend Jon, and possibly there is some doublespeak at work here on his part, but perhaps it only seems so, too. I'm no expert on the formulation and manufacture of ink, and don't presume to understand what are probably very complex issues of chemistry. He's a long way ahead of me on that. He obviously has a lot to guard against in his public commentary. After all, it must be frustrating to do the ink R&D at what is probably no small cost, only to have competitors come out with cheaper variations as soon as he releases his product. So whatever... In the end I don't really care that much what is said by whom about what. I look to my own experience and to that of those I feel I can trust for unbiased information. I just want to print with inks that work. That means ones that don't fade quickly, and that have an agreeable color and hold it. And that means in the PRINTS, not in a swatch test. If your thing is swatches, then I suppose how they fare in testing is important. Extrapolating from there is perhaps dangerous and premature... Phil http://philbard.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] MIS-FS test and PiezoTone test
2002-06-16 by pbard2002
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.