It seems to me that Antonis and Martin should have as conservative a policy as necessary to keep them from having to think/worry about this. My chief concern is that it not add to their administrative load. And my personal preference is for shorter posts with more references and links. Sam samcc@... >Tim, Doug, Austin, > >Thank you for all the feedback. Especially Austin with all the "chapter and >verse." I think we will just leave it as is. It would seem that posting it >to the forum is clearly within fair use but the NYT takes exception to it >appearing without their copyright notice which seems fair enough although I >think clearly identifying them as the source would be good enough. Their >dislike of mass e-mailing I can't do anything about since those all went out >within minutes after the post went up. > >Besides, the more murky the legal waters get the less obliged I feel to sort >it out. My original concern came out of the recent issue over the Binbook(?) >copying of this group's posts without permission. I did not wish to be >hypocritical and do the same thing we had objected to their doing. Perhaps >newspaper articles fall into a different category or the fact that Binbook >was a for-profit operation. > >Perhaps as a guideline for the group for similar situations in the future we >should stick the copyright notice at the end of the text in question. >Further thoughts and opinion are welcome! > >Martin Wesley >http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html
Message
Re: Posting Copyrighted material was: Re: [Digital BW] "Does a Painter With a Camera Cheat?"
2002-06-18 by Sam A. McCandless
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.