Digital BW, The Print

Sam A. McCandless wrote:

>Tim Atherton wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I was recently looking at a site for a lab that does carbon colour prints
>>with an incredible predicted lifespan.
>>
>>They had a link to the tests of there materials on the Wilhelm site, but of
>>course it was dead.
>>
>>I guess they got screwed...
>>    
>>
>
>And lazy?
>
>I assume they were free to create their own reference to Wilhelm's 
>reports, as the Bairs have done on InkJetArt.com. 
>

Why would they have to be "lazy."?

Are we to assume that they have the RIGHT in their contract with Wilhelm 
to publish the reports AFTER Wilhelm has CLEARLY pulled the reports from 
the public domain?

Sure, they can reference Wilhelm numbers, but if no-one can 
 independently say, "yes those numbers exist,"  on what basis is one to 
accept them?  Oh.. wait.. perhaps the answer is Wilhelm's unsullied 
reputation for objective and publicly published results?


Keith
 
 





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]