Digital BW, The Print

Sam A. McCandless wrote:

>As for the rude command Keith added to Lynne Siler's subject line: 
>"Leave WILHELM out of this",
>
I added that so that readers could easily ignore any digression about 
Wilhelm if they so desired.  That way people could still use the 
original thread subject and listen to commentary on the central topic, 
without having to listen to the sidebar debate/commentary about Wilhelm. 
 It was the exact opposite of rude, it was to let listmembers choose to 
read the commentary or not..  The only person it may plausibly have been 
rude to is Wilhelm, but he has made his own bed on this.

> I injected into this thread with good 
>reason the name Keith hates to hear. 
>
I don't hate to hear his name and was NOT attacking you for bringing it 
up..  I just think that as consumers we need to hold people and 
manufacturers accountable for the promises and claims they make..

>I posted Wilhelm's data on 
>Lyson's neutral and sepia quad tone ink sets because those data were 
>relevant to Martin's response to Lynne.
>  
>
And thanks for so doing. Sincerely.

>Keith seems not to disagree with what I went on to say so much as to 
>want to marginalize and harass Wilhelm. I don't think that should 
>have any place on this list either.
>
>  
>

I've already addressed that issue sufficiently to make clear that is NOT 
the "agenda."

Keith
 
 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]