I strongly recommend you actually scan a typical slide/negative with the brand of scanner you are going to buy before you buy it. I personally have never seen a really crisp, sharp scan from any epson scanner, especially with smaller negatives. But they do fine with the larger negs, especially the 4x5. I don't think epson optics are in the same league as canons. Try before you buy, anyhoo. Jer William Cobb wrote: > > Er ... isn't the Epson 2450 42 bit device rather than 48? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: steve1t > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:30 AM > Subject: [Digital BW] Flatbed scanners with film adaptors - good, bad, or ugly? > > Group, > > A dedicated film scanner would be great to have, but is beyond my > needs and means. > > While shopping for a new flatbed scanner, I came across two that > feature built in film adaptors capable of scanning any film or > transparency - up to 4x5" for the Canon D2400UF CanoScan and up > to 6x9" for the Epson Perfection 2450 Photo Scanner. Both feature > 2400x4800 dpi 48 bit scans, street price around $400. > > Does anyone have experience with these or similar scanners? How do > they compare with dedicated film or drum scanners? Are they close > quality wise, or is this too good to be true? > > As for my personal requirements, I'm an amateur photographer with > 35mm, 6x6, and 4x5 negatives and transparencies. No pro or fine art > print sales here, but, I do appreciate fine prints, both color and > b&w and seldom print larger than 11x14. All my new photos are with > a 4 mega pixel Canon G2, RAW file format post processed - I'm > pleased with the results. > > Thanks for any input. > > stephentucker@... > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ADVERTISEMENT > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Flatbed scanners with film adaptors - good, bad, or ugly?
2002-07-08 by Jerry Olson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.