It takes some learning to get top quality scans out of the 2450, particularly with small formats. I feel like I'm getting pretty good at it. For 35mm and smaller, I shim the negative carriers as I find I get better sharpness with the negs raised just a little higher off the glass than the stock carrier provides. For medium format, the stock carrier is fine, and it seemed pretty good for transparencies on my test. I also scan with VueScan exclusively now, I don't use any of the Epson software at all. That takes a bit of learning in itself, particularly for B&W work. Once you get it, though, the results are superb. Godfrey On Monday, July 8, 2002, at 06:42 AM, Kip Babington wrote: > I have the 2450 and have not been pleased with the results the few times > I've tried to scan 35mm black and white negatives. The occasional black > and white prints I've scanned have turned into very nice digital files, > but the film scans have been soft and mushy compared to the scans from > prints. This is based on only a few scans of each type, and from one > with very little scanning experience in general, so take it FWIW.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Flatbed scanners with film adaptors - good, bad, or ugly?
2002-07-09 by Godfrey DiGiorgi
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.