Sam, I gave up on Museo. I just get too much blotchiness, and the blacks are weak. I think for the ultimate in long term storage, where a customer insists on an acid-free, cotton paper, Eclipse Satine is a better way to go. I'll probably start testing and profiling the "soft white" that lacks the optical brighteners for my museum, archival copying work. Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com __________________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: Sam A. McCandless [mailto:samcc@...] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:19 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Somerset Velvet...am I missing something here? >[snip] I'd recommend sticking with the coated papers. I mostly use >EAM. Other >papers I'd recommend are the Hahnemuhle papers (great blacks -- the only >ones I've tested that are better than EAM -- by about 2%) and Brightcube >Eclipse Satine (acid free and the only coated paper I've fade tested that is >a hair better than EAM). > >Paul >http://www.PaulRoark.com But not Crane's Museo? I thought it was a good, if expensive, companion for EAM and one which is both acid-free and free of optical brightners? It also seems to me a nice thickness and weight for the printers without a straight-through paper path. Sam McCandless samcc@... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Somerset Velvet...am I missing something here?
2002-07-10 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.