On 7/17/02 10:34 PM, "Steadman Uhlich" <steadmanuhlich@...> wrote: > To Robert and Martin: > > I sure do wish that Jon would profile the Eclipse for the new inks. I > really like Eclipse...very nice paper. That's one of the reasons that I'm using IP. Robert > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert G. Morrison [mailto:rmorrison@...] > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 6:31 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Revised Selenium PiezoTones Review > > > Double thanks to Martin, I also appreciated your review...it was great to > hear the comments of a veteran silver printer...which I am not. I'm glad > to > hear that I wasn't the only person that liked the ink set. I'm really > looking forward to trying it with Eclipse. I'm getting a piezotone dmax > of > 1.65 with eclipse with IP. It comes up to about 2 when coated. The > uncoated dmax is significantly duller than eam or photorag though. I > think > that the Selenium tones on Eclipse then coated might be the closest thing > we > will get to a fiber based silver print...but we will have to see how much > the coatings change the tonality of the inks. The whole process is a fair > bit of work...but not nearly as much work as actually making a silver > print > with a difficult image! > > Robert > > > On 7/17/02 3:07 PM, "Steadman Uhlich" <steadmanuhlich@...> wrote: > >> Hey Martin, >> >> Thanks for taking the time to post such a long and detailed review. As >> always, I appreciate your experience and your sharing of your opinions > and >> testing results with us. The Selenium PiezoTones sound pretty "cool" > (that >> being a neat, nice, different, pick your own adjective...) (wINK). >> >> Oh...and this is not to slight Robert Morrison, who's testing of the > inks >> and papers is also appreciated too. >> >> Regards, >> >> Steadman >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Martin Wesley [mailto:mwesley250@...] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 1:58 PM >> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >> Subject: [Digital BW] Revised Selenium PiezoTones Review >> >> >> Due to a typo and a mistake regarding Dmax in my initial post, I am >> reposting this information to clear up any misunderstandings (and > correct >> my >> grammar. <G>). >> >> Revised Selenium PiezoTones Review (Cross posted) >> >> I received sample bottles of ConeTech's new selenium hue PiezoTone ink >> about >> three weeks ago for Beta testing and have been using them steadily with > a >> CIS in an Epson 1280 for the past two weeks. >> >> As far as my own personal tastes go, this is the best grayscale ink set > I >> have seen and I prefer it to anything else I have tried. The hue and the >> chromatic complexity of the prints I have been making over the past few >> days >> is indeed right in the range that we commonly associate with selenium >> toned >> silver fiber prints. They have slightly cool highlights and a touch of >> magenta in the midtones and shadows. I have toned silver prints on > Ilford, >> Kodak and Oriental hanging on my living room wall and, while the > Selenium >> PT >> prints are not an exact match to any of them, they fit right in. Only >> their >> matte surface gives them away as not being air dried silver fiber and >> mixed >> with matte surface silver fiber would be undetectable as inkjet. >> >> I would not call the Selenium PT inks "neutral" and probably would not >> like >> them so much if they were. The standard selenium toned silver fiber > print >> that we tend to think of as neutral is in fact not neutral at all. The >> nature of the specific emulsion, the color of the paper base and the >> manner >> in which the toning was done results in a print that is subtly varies in >> hue >> as well as tone. This variation that I call chromatic complexity is what >> makes silver prints so wonderful and so alive. Even book publishers know >> that a true monotone does not adequately represent a photograph and >> quality >> books are done using 2 to 4 inks of different hue to simulate what is >> happening in a silver print. >> >> My primary paper is Hahnemuhle Photo Rag and the Selenium PT works >> beautifully with this paper. I think the tone on EAM may be a bit better >> though. This is my standard proofing paper but the difference in tone > may >> pull me back in that direction although Photo Rag is probably more >> archival, >> has a nicer texture and brighter white, there seems to be less warming > on >> the EAM and the initial hue is just a bit more pleasing. >> >> I also tried prints on Hahnemühle German Etching and William Turner, > Crane >> Museo, Legion Photo Matte and Eclipse Satine. The finished look of the >> print >> varies a great deal with the paper you use and this is good news since > it >> means you can get a lot of different looks just by switching paper. The >> very >> white Legion Photo Matte and Eclipse Satine (Jon can we please, please >> have >> a paper profile for Eclipse!?!?) show more blue and greater variation in >> hue >> overall. The neutral paper base lets all the complex tones in the inks >> show >> through. The Legion Photo Matte is too bright for my taste but the > Eclipse >> looks very interesting. It seems to do much better with the Selenium PT >> than >> it did with the original Piezo inks. I tried the Orwell profile but it > was >> not quite right in the lower tones. On the German Etching and Wil. > Turner >> the prints were excellent but the cream-colored paper base cancels out a >> good deal of the coolness in the highlights giving a more neutral look. >> Museo is very pleasant with this ink set. Some of the coolness is lost > but >> it still a very nice alternative to Photo Rag and EAM. >> >> The Dmax of the Selenium PT is identical to the Warm Neutral. Which is > to >> say very high. On EAM I recorded values in the 1.71 range and on Photo > Rag >> at 1.80. These were taken from wedges printed using the Piezo driver. > The >> Photo Rag density is getting very close to silver print Dmax. So close >> that >> the difference does not jump out at you like it does when the inkjet > print >> Dmax is down at 1.6. Since it appears that the black of the Selenium PT > is >> the same as the Warm-Neutral it should be possible to obtain even higher >> Dmax values using other drivers. With the Warm-Neutral I was getting > Dmax >> values in the 1.88 to 1.90 range and values of 1.94 have been reported. >> >> Regarding fading I have no data and I don't know how it will compare to >> other ink sets. Jon has said it is undergoing RIT testing and did well > on >> in-house Xenon fade testing. I do notice some warming. It takes about 12 >> to >> 24 hours for the prints to "settle" and achieve Dmax and initial color. >> This >> is similar to what I saw with the WN-PT. The change is not very large > and >> you can accurately assess your prints out of the printer reasonably well >> once they are dry. After a few days the Photo Rag prints did show some >> visible warm shifting but it seems slight and not objectionable. The EAM >> showed much less warm shifting. This is pretty much in keeping with the >> other ink sets I have tried. >> >> Metamerism seems very slight and not at all unpleasant. In tungsten and >> halogen light the prints are warmer as you would expect and the magenta >> predominates a bit. In fluorescent, daylight and mixed tungsten/daylight >> the >> prints are more neutral. Looks great under all light sources that I > tried. >> >> Like the WN-PiezoTones I experienced no clogging problems or green > casts. >> The CIS started right up immediately after vacuum loading and 4 nozzle >> cleanings, and has passed every nozzle check since. >> >> At this point my favorite inks for use with the Piezo driver are >> Selenium-PiezoTone, Warm Neutral-PiezoTone, MIS-FS and MIS-FS Neutral in >> that order. For me and my own tastes, I think the PiezoTones are the >> better >> way to go. I especially recommend the Selenium-PT to people who are >> transitioning from traditional silver fiber printing to inkjet. While > you >> will still need to get used to the matte surface of the papers, you will >> not >> have to go through a big hue adjustment. >> >> All in all the Selenium-PiezoTone inks represent a really stunning >> addition >> to what is available for inkjet printing. With the reduced price of the >> Piezo driver and these new inks, I strongly suggest you give them a try. >> We >> each have our own likes and preferences but I will be very surprised if >> this >> does not become a top contender for the most popular ink set. >> >> Martin Wesley >> >> http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html >> >> >>
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Revised Selenium PiezoTones Review
2002-07-18 by Robert Morrison
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.