> I'm curious about your experience with the Nikon 8000 and the > glass-covered holder. I have heard conflicting reports. It does > solve the DOF problem, but some have said that the Newton-ring > problem is bad and/or that the glass doesn't allow quite as > sharp a scan. I'm not concerned about dust. I have been trying > to track down some special anit-reflective glass (not etched!) to > replace the glass in the Nikon holder. Thanks! I don't notice any practical difference in sharpness between the glass and regular holders. The only Newton ring problem I've had was when I scanned some colour film that was left in the holder for a day and a half. If Newton rings do show up, Nikon provides some spacers that should help. That being said, I've never had a need to use the spacers. I scan mostly B&W negs, which means I can't use ICE and must spend a bit more time cleaning dust off the negs and glass, but that's about the only drawback I've come across.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Nikon 8000 vs. Polaroid 120
2002-07-22 by Moreno Polloni
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.