Hi Herb, > > I do believe my images are fine without PS...but that > > doesn't mean ALL my images have perfect everything, I've never said > that. > > Certainly not the case. I probably print one out of 10-20 at > > BEST...sometimes only a handful out of 100 or more! > > > > All your points are well-made and well-taken. If you've got a shot > you think is perfect without doing anything in Photoshop, then of > course you don't need to do anything. My only point. > But answer me this: From among the 80% or 90% of pictures that you > decide not to print, don't you think there may be some that could be > made "perfect" by doing something to them in Photoshop? To "some" degree, of course. > Why throw > them away, when you've got Photoshop to tweak them into what you > want? I don't simply throw them away, but I have enough images to deal with already...and have no need to do that. > ...it really does seem like you've got an > illogical bias against Photoshop. -- Herb But Herb, I NEVER said I have ANY bias against Photoshop!!! NEVER. What I said is I, and only I, don't find the need to do any manipulations in PS, and others have said that it is an absolute must to do, or my images are inferior...and I disagree. That doesn't make me biased against PS... Regards, Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question
2002-07-28 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.