--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Bob Frost" <bobfrost@b...> wrote: > Austin, > > Daring to intervene in this 'battle of wits', it occurs to me that the > photographs you are taking are perhaps NOT art. Art is surely something that > is an interpretation of the scene that is in the mind of the artist; it is > not just a record of the scene in front of him/her. Your statements seem to > say that you simply insist on accurately photographically RECORDING the > scene in front of you. That probably makes you a scientist, not an artist. > > Bob Frost. Whoooooah, back the perfect print pony up there Bob! Art is is purely expression, and whatever means an artists wishes to employ to express them selves is purely personal. Some artists (photographers in this case) choose to tweak their photos in order to obtain what the ellusive "perfect" print, whether in photoshop or in the darkroom. Yes my beloved Ansel did it and so does John Sexton, and while their prints are gorgeous, they are no more or less art than photos taken by people who dont want to be bothered with image manipulation. The fault in your logic is that you are putting to much emphasis on on print quality, and not the other important aspects art, such as form and content. without these other essential pieces of the puzzle, the most beautifully printed photograph in the world would be a worthless worthless piece of paper. do you really think that ansels photos would would have stood the test of time based solely on how much effort he put into printing them, without his remarkable use of natural light, or his breathtaking compositions? sure one can add lighting in ps and pass it off, thats fine, but theres something about using what nature, or man in austins case, has given us in a perfect moment thats, well, zen. austin you remind me of my photo instructor. he has instilled a strong disciplne within himself when it comes to photographing. he always uses the entire frame when he shoots, and wont print negatives that he has to crop, and while he and i have gone round and round about it (jokingly), i completely respect the fact that he does this. neither of us are heavy into dodging and burning either, only when necessary. one may call us lazy, but i'd call us disinterested. i think my print quality is above average for the short aount of time ive been in the game, but his darkroom prints are absolutley gorgeous, chock full of tonality and tack sharp. oh and austin, your prints are great. I especially like the child and the dock photos, and they are definately, POSITIVELY fine art. john
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question
2002-07-28 by uncljohnson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.