From the profiler RGB term 5. License Restrictions. You may not do any of the following yourself, or through any other person and you may not permit any third party with whom you have a business relationship to do any of the following: ...(D) sell, license, sublicense, lease, rent, distribute, disclose, permit access to, or transfer to any third party, whether for profit or without charge, any portion of the Software or any product (as a separate product or bundled with any other products other than the Software) created with the Software (including, without limitation, profiles in .ICM or .ICC format), or, in particular, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, distribute the Software or any such product on any media, over networks, electronic bulletin boards, or websites, or allow any third party to use the Software; (E) publish or otherwise communicate any review of or information about Software performance to any third party without the prior written consent of ColorVision; These seem pretty draconian and un-enforcable terms to me. (I hope no- one on here has actaully reviewed the performance of this software...! If I was a journalist writing a review, my response to this would be - bollocks..) This is especially so as in general, as I understand it, for a contract such as this to be truly binding, it must have the possiblitly of being ammended by both parties. This isn't, as far as I can tell, something that is covered by say Copyright law, so there is no standard fallback set of statutes for what they are demanding. Tim A
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Epson 7600/9600 B/W Output Not What I Hoped For.
2002-07-30 by rubalong
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.