Digital BW, The Print

> Hmmm...I suspect that if I had formed my opinions of Piezo, MIS, etc., 
etc.
> based on the first 2 weeks' output of any member of this list, I'd be 
saying
> those systems suck heartily. Say what you will about Reichmann--at 
least he
> is speaking from personally living with and working with the printer,
> instead of writing off an entire new system based on a few samples 
of some
> other guy's work.
> 
> Until people on this list have given the new system even a fraction of 
the
> effort they spent perfecting their quad/hex work, or seen samples 
printed by
> someone who does "get what B&W printing is all about" in their 
personal
> judgement, it's all just meaningless speculation, isn't it?
> 
> Doug


Well, Doug, I don't know how long it took you to get a good print from 
any of the quad solutions, but for myself Piezo blew me away the first 
time a made a print.  And that print is still better than anything I was 
previously able to make using CMYK inks. You might think twice before 
you advance these kind of absurd generalizations.

And speaking of thinking twice, your post was downright insulting to one 
of the more respected voices on this list, and to the rest of us as well.  
I suggest you take a break from whatever it is you are doing and clear 
out a bit...

Phil
http://philbard.com
http://laphotoworkshops.com