Jeff Magidson wrote: >With all this clamoring and sour notes about why Epson decided not to >include this software please keep in mind that this software is an >unknown quantity. It may be really quite useless or just novelty for the >serious user. Why not just take a deep breath and wait until the >printers are in major circulation with lots or reports and then decide >if you want to drive Epson crazy with demands for the Gray Balancer. > > > > Let's see.. How much extra could it cost them to include the software...? $5 per unit max I would guess.. Given that I'd say they should have included the software and let people not use it if it sucked... ;-) I mean, how many people actually use the Epson PhotoPrint software instead of Elements, PhotoShop, etc? Better to include it and let the market decide.. That's why I think my informants are correct as to the reasoning that sold EPSON.. As for the interests of those making and selling profiles, EPSON could probably not give a darn, but, it would almost certainly influence the viewpoint of those individuals selling the profiles if they were consulted... It's why I keep ads off my EPSON site 100%, and won't ever start a inkjet supply biz.. I'd rather be free of even the perception of any potential conflict of interest.. Keith [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] News on Epson 2200 Gray Balancer SW
2002-08-01 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.