Digital BW, The Print

Todd,

The new MIS inks look interesting and I have been thinking about 
getting a 1280. (Just have to figure out where to put it! Need to 
save some room in case that free 7000 shows up.)

How do the MIS inks compare to the Piezo's in terms of "clog" issues? 
Any improvements there? Dmax comparison? Dither pattern or "window 
screen" problems? And I would guess that the No More Carts CIS would 
be a better choice than the MIS CIS?

Thanks,
Martin

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., tflash <tflash@e...> wrote:
> on 7/31/01 5:59 PM, tflash wrote:
> 
> > So, without further ado, please check the link below for more 
details.
> > 
> > http://www.PaulRoark.com
> 
> 
> When I posted Paul's site before I had not yet seen the updated MIS 
website.
> They are doing a great job over there! Inkjetmall must be sweating 
bullets.
> Anyway, go straight to MIS, and follow the link for "workflow" 
under MIS
> Variable Mix Quadtones. It's all there, in all it's glory.
> 
> Here's both MIS links to be sure you get there:
> 
> http://www.inksupply.com/index.cfm?source=html/quadtone.html
> 
> http://www.inksupply.com/index.cfm?source=html/workflow.html
> 
> Todd
> 
> PS, to be fair to the PiezoBW system, the Roak method is way 
cheaper, and
> more flexible with it's variable tone, but the Piezo setup is 
lovely, and
> with it's included profiles, it's easier. But if you were a 
tinkerer, and
> experimenter in the darkroom, You might like the Roark method. Why 
should
> all our images be the same color?