--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" <mwesley250@e...> wrote: > Tyler, > > I have the EZcolor so I might as well give it a try. Maybe someone > else has info on the Profiler RGB. Profiler RGB is built into Pro, so I've got it. > Might be worth getting the Profiler Pro and giving the scanner a try > before buying the Spectrocam. Spread out the pain. Martin, when I get the chance I'll try it again in the next few days with the scanner and post the result. > > BTW, how do you like the Spectrocam? If you had to do it over again > would you go with this or something else? The Spectrocam was probably the first real econo scanning photospectrometers, anything else was out of my budget, which really didn't actually exist. I've been through 3 of them, 1st one failed, 2nd one was very innacurate, third one I returned for replacement just because there was a recall. Except for the 2nd one they all performed well, and the service I've recieved was great. I got mine from Pilot Marketing, who seems to have disappeared from the internet. The DTP-41 is considered the one best, and I think the price has been dropping. I'd do it again for this kind of stuff, if I was using it a lot for work purposes that generate income, I'd look into the reliability of the DTP-41. It might be more robust. Tyler
Message
Re: Culbertson's RGB method A-OK
2001-08-30 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.