Andrew, you are making it sound like they have to invent the wheel all over again. It boils down to writing a driver and profiles and picking up a decent mono inkset or two and filling a few carts - which they don't even have to stock in every Costco and Staples around either. They can of course pick any of their printers, including the 2200, to profile. Imagine what they can do with that: they can get a nice jump on the market with 7 gray inks and a way to mix cool-to-warm. Since they put the chip there to punish us, in the first place, for using aftermarket inks, they might as well make a profit from the bw market. And, btw, where in planet Epson, should mere mortals write to have their voice heard? How long is cloak-and-dagger, cat-and-mouse chasing of Epson hardware going to go on? They have looked upon us as the enemy who stole their ink money, instead of reaching out to a segment of the market potentially as big as what keeps Ilford and many others alive. Where is Japanese niche marketing when we need it? Where are the guys who cloned Leica 80 years after its invention to make it cheaper if not better<G>...? Antonis --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "thedigitaldog" <andrew@d...> wrote: > In other words, having a true B&W printer from Epson is NOT a technological > problem. It's one of cost to put such a product to market.
Message
If only Epson made a bw printer (to Andrew)
2002-08-03 by antonisphoto
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.