Digital BW, The Print

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" <
mwesley250@e...> wrote:
> Hey guys. Can we please not get into an equipment war here? I have seen a
> lot of good prints made with both the 1280 and the 3000. I have seen some
> not so good ones from both as well. As the saying goes, "I isn't what you
> have, it's how you use it."
> 
> Someone asked for some advice as to whether to go with a 3000 or a 1280 and
> needs some opinions. Those opinions are going to vary but let's keep the
> peace. Okay?
> 
> Thanks,
> Martin Wesley

My apologies Martin. Rather than beating my chest and grunting about 
the prowess of the particular Epson I use, I was reacting specifically 
to the fact that advice was requested. Am I wrong or did we all decide 
to go with the "world is actually round" thing a while ago? There seems 
to be misconception presented as fact in a very authorative tone that 
occassionally draws me out of my cave.

A I-have-more-wives-and-livestock-and-my-Epson-is-better-than-yours 
thread would be entirely different. While amusing for about 5 minutes, 
I wouldn't want anything to do with it. Steve's been doing quads even 
longer than I. He started during the Johnston administration I think, 
I'm sure he's simply frustrated with new "ideas" as well. It's probably 
just an old guy thing.
Tyler