Lawrence, At this point I have a fair amount of experience with the Selenium PiezoTones and three prints and some step wedges on EAM from Carl Schofield's 2200 to compare. Carl's prints were done with the supplied Epson driver and no custom profiles. What I see in the 2200 prints is a neutral tone print with no color crossovers and very mild metamerism. Like the 2000P prints they tend toward the magenta-purple in tungsten light and toward yellow or yellow-green in daylight. The amount is much, much less than the 2000P prints. It is just a bit too strong for my own tastes but I think that many people will not notice it at all or will find it acceptable. The tone in tungsten light is rather nice. I assume that it would be possible to adjust the color balance or use a custom profile to get a neutral tone for a particular light source. The tonality of the 2200 prints is very smooth. Carl's prints were from a Canon D-30 and that clean, grainless quality is very well produced. This looks to be a very good print engine and I look forward to when it is possible to use it with third party inks. Is it a better than the 1280? Hard to say without being able to print the same image on both. When my 1280 is running well, which is most of the time, I would say they appear to be comparable. For myself I will stick with Selenium PT, MIS-VM or WN-PT because I prefer the hue of those inks, they exhibit more chromatic complexity than the 2200 prints and the life of the 2200 prints is not acceptable to me. I would like to have a 2200 for color work, but for B&W I would still recommend a 1280 and a grayscale ink for desktop printing. Martin Wesley http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "lawrencetrek" <ltitle@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Comparison of PiezoTones vs. Epson 2200 > Is there anyone out there with significant experience with the PiezoTone inks > and who also has tried printing B/W output from the Epson 2200 who can > critically compare these two. There are conflicting reports: some are ready to > pack up Piezography, while others are saying the 2200 still can't compete for > B/W output (e.g. continued problems with color casts and metamerism). I am > especially interested in anyone who has custom printer profiles for their 2200 > or who has access to the Gray Balancer software. > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Comparison of PiezoTones vs. Epson 2200
2002-08-16 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.