Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Piezo vs. Randall example and results. Questions,....

2002-08-18 by Martin Wesley

Richard,

That kind of tonal transition is seems to be a tough one for inkjet
printing. I have found the Epson driver is often a better choice in cases
like this. I am afraid I have more questions than answers.

Can you give us some info on the file size, 16 or 8 bit, ppi?

How does the histogram look?

What happens if you print the straight scan from 16-bit mode without any
adjustments?

Martin Wesley

http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html



----- Original Message -----
From: "rich8155" <richard@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 2:58 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] Piezo vs. Randall example and results. Questions,....


> Hello all,
>
> I'm still a relative beginner at this but after 2 months I am
> getting some very satisfactory results.  Some background: I use an
> Epson 1160 with an MIS CFS loaded with MIS FS-N inks.  I have the
> Piezo driver and usually print with that as I have found in
> comparisons with the Epson driver (with Randall curve applied) the
> Piezo gives more dotless mid-tones and highlights.  Sometimes
> however some prints look better with the Randall curve (the Piezo
> tends to print darker).  So, with the less dots I have mostly used
> the Piezo driver and have been in awe of the smooth mid-tones in
> particular.
>
> But now I have printed an image that is showing me an amazing
> difference from the Piezo driver results to the Epson drive/randall
> curve results, and the Piezo is falling very flat in this instance.
> The image can be found here:
>
> <http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=956273&size=lg>
>
> as you can see we have some fairly fast and radical transition from
> severe highlights to almost pure black.  I printed the Piezo one
> first and as you can see there are obvious and very poor transition
> points to be seen around the highlights.  The result is awful and
> unacceptable output.  The Epson driver/Randall curve seems to have
> handled the transition in a much smoother and acceptable manner.
>
> I have printed out two 21stepNew.jpg wedges using each driver since
> then and I cannot really see any fault with either of them (again
> though the Piezo prints darker shadows). They both look very good to
> my untrained and less-experienced eye.  So I am puzzled.
>
> I am not showing this to try and put down the Piezo driver.  I am
> more asking if what I am finding here is typical or perhaps points
> to a problem with my method or process.  If I only printed with the
> Piezo I would think it has something to do with my printer, but from
> the Randall results we can see the printer has the ability to print
> just fine.  I have followed the set-up and workflow of both
> drivers/curves precisely.
>
> Any suggestions on why I'm getting these results?
>
> Thank you for any input and comment.
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
&amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.