The reason to use Imageprint is better image quality and profiles on demand. Imageprint print quality is vastly superior to piezo plugin peformance. The profiles are much better (cleaner and smoother). The final output has less noise and as a result the image look sharper. It is similar to piezopro...but Imageprint is making custom profiles for the new piezotone inks as well as the MIS FS and FS-N inks...which are not identical to the original Cone inks which piezopro was made for. You will also get 2200/7600/9600 support which makes printing reasonable BW images with the new epson printers possible. It also runs on a mac and pc...while piezo pro runs on a PC. In addition it is only $500 for a desktop version while it runs $1500 to get into piezopro. The large format version is $1500. Hope that helps, Robert On 8/19/02 7:02 AM, "Truman Prevatt" <tprevatt@...> wrote: > I just spent some time at the Colorbyte site and the way I read it is > with Imageprint, one can use use the peizo inks or the MIS inks. As > anyone done a comparison between Imageprint and Peizo driver for the > Peizo inks? > > There is a lot of functionally there. But it's a lot of functionally > many potential customers do not need and would not use. Too bad they > don't have two versions. Yes I know the argument of R&D cost, but there > is also the argument of economies of scale.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Imageprint
2002-08-19 by Robert Morrison
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.