Digital BW, The Print

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert G. Morrison" <rmorrison@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Imageprint


> On 8/19/02 11:22 AM, "Martin Wesley" <mwesley250@...> wrote:
>
(snip)
> >
> > Well the quality with the 2200 seems to be better that I initially
thought
> > but due to print life it is not something I would consider for my own
work.
>
> I agree.  It is a very attractive option for commercial photographers who
> want to crank out RC prints on an E-surface paper though.

I expect that it will have a very wide appeal.
>
(snip)
>
> >> There aren't a lot of profile made already...but they will make
whatever
> >> you need...that's the key to imageprint.
> >
> > Well that part is a very good deal. Given that the PT profiles are in
the
> > works, what is your impression of the PT inks with IP4's Piezo profiles
with
> > the PT? Can you compare the results with the PT and the Piezo driver vs.
PT
> > with IP4 and it's Piezo profiles?
>
> IP's profiles for the Piezotones are much, much better  than those in the
> piezo plugin or Piezopro profiles.

Are the Piezotone profiles already available for the 1280 version?
>
(snip)
>
> Absolutely.  The newer dither is fantastic...the best out there in my
> opinion.  This is a rapidly evolving product and each change makes it
better
> and better in my opinion.  The soon to be released OSX version, I believe,
> will be the ultimate print engine.

Sound pretty good. Are you paying the annual $495 maintenance fee for
support and upgrades? How is the support, by the way?

Martin