>I improperly ordered a set of MIS FS (cone) >instead of the 'E' (epson) hex inksets for my 2000P. >When I called yesterday, the information I received said that only >the PC and PM needed to be replaced..... True. The FS "E" series just replaces the PC & PM inks. The Piezo driver uses equal density ink in the "light/photo" ink positions, such that C=PC & M=PM. In the "E" series FS inks, the "light/photo" ink positions should be clearly lighter. >But, when I did a CMY to BW conversion, I obtained densities of >C = 30 % >M = 68 % >Y = 7 % >B = 100 % I don't know what you mean by a "CMY to BW conversion." >From the non E FS hexset, I have inks with densities of >B = 100 >C , PC = 25 % >M , PM = 7.3 >Y = 3.4 >So, the Cs and Ms are mislabeled, there is a >nonproportionality between ink density and printed >shade and the PC and PM for the Epson set will then >be perhaps 15% and 5% ??? I think we need to post a standard purge pattern file and scans of purge patterns for the various inksets (with the settings used to make them). Unfortunately, I don't have a scan of the FS-"E" inkset that shows what the inks should look like. Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
[Digital BW] BW densities ??
2002-08-24 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.