Steve, Thanks for your response. Sounds like Somerset Enhanced does a good job for you. I'll give it a try to see if it works with my current project. One more point. Do you use Piezo software with Somerset Enhanced? The new PiezoTone inks? If so, do you find the profiles to be satisfactory when moving from one paper to another. I am finding that with PiezoTone ST the same file prints with significant differences in the output, i.e., the print, depending on whether I use Archival Matte, H. Photo Rag, or Museo ( Museo prints are much too heavy, although the paper can be made to look as good as the other two -- EAM and Photo Rag are much more consistent, although Photo Rag seems a little more contrasty). I was under the impression that the profiles were suppose to narrow the differences between the papers much more than they actually do. Perhaps I am expecting too much. But it would be nice if it were possible to go from one paper to the next without too much additional difficulty. I have no quarrel with the final output, however. I agree with Austin. The results on the Epson 3000 can be very stunning indeed with the Piezo system. Jerry Campbell --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., sdmey4@a... wrote: > You should't have any problem with the 225 Sumerset Enhanced. I've run a > couple hundred 17x22 through my 3000. The 308 photo rag I would have to say > probably won't fly. But the 188 Photrag should be fine. > Steven Meyers > In a message dated 8/24/2002 1:03:04 PM Pacific Daylight Time, > impact4u@m... writes: > > > > Have you tried using a heavier fine art paper such as the Somerset Photo > > Enhanced 225gsm or maybe the H. Photo Rag 308gsm? My understanding > > is that the printer would have trouble using heavier papers such as these, > > although I haven't heard that directly from anyone using the printer. > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 3000 opinions
2002-08-24 by impact4u2
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.