Digital BW, The Print

Yes I do use Piezo software but with the original sundance Inks. I did take a 
file over to a friends Piezotone Warm neutral 3000 and even with these two 
inks there where some minor differances. My files also print with minor 
differances on My MIS FS 7000 vs the original piezo inks.  My 3000 doesn't 
get much use anymore, and , I can add I ran 100's of sheets of 310gsm Orwell 
through before it started a skewing problem(top slight different than the 
bottom in size) I think I strethched the transport mechanism running all that 
thick paper through it. I plan to put the new Selinium toned inks in the 3000 
but so far have avoided it, as I'm not in the mood for tweaking my files 
again. But then again I plan to set it up for new work only, so that won't be 
a problem. I have not heard of anyone getting a great match using the same 
profiles and different cone inksets.
Steve Meyers
n a message dated 8/24/2002 3:22:04 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
impact4u@... writes:


> Thanks for your response.  Sounds like Somerset Enhanced does a good job 
> for you.  I'll give it a try to see if it works with my current project.  
> 
> One more point.  Do you use Piezo software with Somerset Enhanced?  The 
> new PiezoTone inks?  If so, do you find the profiles to be satisfactory 
> when 
> moving from one paper to another.  I am finding that  with PiezoTone ST the 
> 
> same file prints with significant  differences in the output, i.e., the 
> print, 
> depending on whether I use Archival Matte, H. Photo Rag, or Museo ( Museo 
> prints are much too heavy, although the paper can be made to look as good 
> as the other two -- EAM and Photo Rag are much more consistent, although 
> Photo Rag seems a little more contrasty).  
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]