EAM is shit for midtones - others love it but it sucks (tin hat on) PR is a world away but it costs more. I use eam for proofing only and PR or WT for final prints Julian ----- Original Message ----- From: "treadwinkle" <VOLveeta@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:58 PM Subject: [Digital BW] New Piezotone for 1280 user... help please... I love the colors of these inks. I've gotten a couple of really lovely prints, but my primary subjects are actors for headshots. The transition from shadow to light is a little abrupt. I've only used Epson Archival Matte so far, will better papers help? On a tight face shot, the transition from shadow to midtone to light is just a bit too "defined". I'm blanking on the term, but it's that "digitalized" or "pixelated" look going from one color to the next. It makes the image look pretty flat. Will the Hahnem\ufffdhle photo rag that I just ordered help this? Thanks for any info. Treadwinkle Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] New Piezotone for 1280 user... help please...
2002-08-26 by Julian Thomas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.