On 8/27/02 6:35 AM, "lawrencetrek" <ltitle@...> wrote: > Doesn't sound like the printing nirvana that thedigitaldog was raving about a > week or so ago. We will continue to watch on the sidelines for now. > I believe that imageprint and the piezotone inks are the best option out there for BW printing at the moment. The 2200 and Imageprint would be a good option if you were committed to having only one printer or absolutely need glossy/pearl BW output on a regular basis and were not concerned about silver print longevity. There are definite weaknesses to the Ultrachrome inks (price, longevity and hilight detail when compared to quad options)...but I'm sure they will be the right solution for some people...but I believe from what I've seen that they are only a solution when paired with Imageprint. That said, Imageprint is also the best solution at this point for people using quad inks. This is particularly true if your are using the piezotones. Robert
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Imageprint
2002-08-27 by Robert Morrison
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.