--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Jerry Olson <jerryolson@r...> wrote: > Moreno, he asked what makes a good print, and technically if he followed > these rules, he'd have a pretty nice print. You can always break the > rules if you want. > > Jerry > Jerry- Those sound like pretty good "rules" to me, too...adding that you can only "break" them if you know them and understand them and then break them for a reason. It seems there is more "bashing" of the technical side of photography overpowering the artistic side in the digital forums...only natural, I guess, since digital photography is pretty impressive technology. But I have always believed also, that you can only get free from the technical part of photography (film or digital) by knowing the technology and equipment limits so well that you were able to use the tools instinctively and intuitively as opposed to the photographer who really has not put in the time to "know all there is to know" about the technology and is therefore more of a slave to it (and the manuals). The great thing about this particular forum is that there is a sporadic intense thread that nurtures one or the other (or both) concepts...that go into the making of the ART. It really doesn't matter which side motivates you to start the process...you need BOTH to really complete it. Your work is a great example of "out of the box" thinking and creativity that is possible only because of your immaculate preparation on the technology side... Keep it coming. Tom O'Connell
Message
Re: The perfect print
2002-08-30 by tomoc
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.